Hearing Loss Doesn't Equal Hearing Function
Today, I had the opportunity to work with a mother and her one-year old son. She returned to the Speech-Language-Hearing Center at Utah State University for another opinion about the status of her son's hearing loss. Previously, "Allan" was diagnosed with a bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. In fact, he was diagnosed shortly after birth, fitted with powerful digital hearing aids, and has received intensive early intervention designed to maximize his amplified residual hearing and to develop his spoken language. Allan's case is what we hope to see happen for all children with hearing loss!
His parents also have been through the cochlear implant candidacy process with Allan, which found that he indeed was a great candidate for bilateral cochlear implants. Sequential surgeries have been scheduled for him later this month for his right ear and his left ear will be implanted in November.
The primary reason that his parents wanted another opinion about his hearing status is because Allan is actually doing very well with his listening and spoken language development! He is imitating almost all of the beginning vowels and consonants, can turn his head when his name is called from across the room, dances when he hears music, and he is using approximately five words consistently.
And now, to borrow a phrase from Paul Harvey, here is the rest of the story. Earlier this week, Allan's mom took him to see a "pediatric" audiologist who was located closer to her home. Allan's cochlear implant surgeries are already scheduled, and the goal of the audiological appointment was to confirm his hearing status -- just one last time. Since he is doing so well in his communication development, his parents wanted to make doubly sure that his hearing had not improved.
Unfortunately, the appointment went awry. The audiologist did confirm Allan's severe-to-profound hearing loss. However, instead of honoring the parents' decision to seek bilateral cochlear implants, the audiologist proceeded to explain that cochlear implants weren't successful in prelingually deafened children and that they should seek out the resources at the state school for the deaf. He then expressed his affection for Deaf Culture.
Of course, this was inaccurate information that led to inappropriate recommendations.The audiologist seemingly wasn't informed about current evidence-based practices with pediatric hearing loss. The parents' decisions were appropriate for Allan -- given his early diagnosis, the degree of hearing loss, the functional benefit he has received from hearing aids, and the progress he's made in his communication development. His parents also realize that his speech and language most likely will reach a developmental plateau, and cochlear implants are the logical next step. The path Allan's parents have chosen for him is based on their desired outcomes for him; namely, that he will use spoken language and be mainstreamed with his same-age peers in their neighborhood school.
If the audiologist had listened to Allan's parents and fully evaluated his functional hearing, I would like to believe that he would have made different recommendations or actually supported the decisions they already have made. We'll never know for sure. Based on his general attitudes, it seems that he had very low expectations for what a child with a bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss could achieve. When will professionals -- and in this case professionals who should know better -- stop predicting a child's future success using just one piece of information -- the audiogram? We all can agree that the audiogram is critical in rendering a diagnosis of hearing loss; however, its usefulness is limited. The audiogram doesn't measure how a child with hearing loss will respond to and use auditory information. In other words, hearing loss doesn't equal hearing function.
Allan's parents are now reassured about their decisions for him, and they look forward to what he will achieve as a bilateral cochlear implant user. While they know he always will have a severe-to-profound hearing loss, they foresee a life full of possibilities -- rather than limitations. Thank goodness some parents disregard the advice they receive from the so-called experts!

Sep 6, 2009 at 9:50 AM This story illustrates the very reason that I believe the American Academy of Audiology is not doing its job. Why are audiologists not being given information about pediatric cochlear implants and rehab? They have a wonderful magazine that they put out, and an outstanding convention each year. There should not be ANY audiologists who do not have the facts about sensorineural hearing loss in infants and children. Imagine all the families "led astray" and they miss that window of opportunity to implant their child at a time they can more easily learn vocal language. I can't imagine any audiologist not having the facts in this day and age. There is no excuse. I'm very grateful to the Speech-Language-Hearing Center at Utah State University and the service they provide. Thank you for your support of families like Allan's!
Sep 6, 2009 at 10:27 AM Excellent Blog. In our MarkeTrak VII paper "Are a million children with hearing loss in America being left behind" http://www.betterhearing.org/pdfs/marketrak7-children.pdf
we found substantial evidence of conflicting and misleading information given by physicians and audiologists to parents. I find it incredulous that the major intervention for children with hearing loss is front row seating in the classroom and that so many parents are told there is nothing that can be done about the child's hearing loss. Some were even told "he'll get used to it" or "she will outgrow it". I wonder sometimes if we have enough trained pediatric audiologists in America?
Sep 9, 2009 at 11:00 AM Denise -
I agree this was a difficult situation that was "created" by the audiologist's lack of information and training. I've had the privilege of working with excellent audiologists who would be appalled this happened to a family. But, you're right; we must do more to make sure all professionals are well-trained, and consumers must hold them accountable for their actions. Thanks for your post!
Todd
Oct 3, 2009 at 5:34 AM Why cant the family do both? Get the CI and involve the child with the Deaf community?
Oct 3, 2009 at 7:57 PM Shelly, in this situation, the parents had made a clear choice, which wasn't supported or honored by the audiologist. In fact, they had done extensive research about Deaf Culture and met with several Deaf adults. For now, they wish to pursue cochlear implants for their child, and that decision should have been supported.